Hashing out my philosophical positions

As CS Lewis pointed out, “I believe in Christianity as I believe that the sun has risen: not only because I see it, but because by it I see everything else.” The Christian worldview, perhaps, offers the most parsimonious, consistent, and satisfying answers to the set of existential questions that all people ask - what is the meaning of life? Is there life after death? For what reasons do suffering exist? So, in light of my belief as a Christian, I ought to view all of philosophy through the lens of Christian doctrines. Let's begin with survey that Philpapers put out in 2020, along with the percentage of philosophers that agree with my view.

Highlights Key: 

Green - Well-read

Yellow -- Know about topic, not too well read

Red -- Don't know at all

A priori knowledge: yes or no? -- Yes (72.84%)

Abstract objects: Platonism or nominalism? -- Platonism (38.38%)

Aesthetic value: objective or subjective? -- objective (43.53%)

Aim of philosophy (which is most important?): truth/knowledge, understanding, wisdom, happiness, or goodness/justice? -- understanding (55.79%)

Analytic-synthetic distinction: yes or no? -- yes (62.48%)

Eating animals and animal products (is it permissible to eat animals and/or animal products in ordinary circumstances?): omnivorism (yes and yes), vegetarianism (no and yes), or veganism (no and no)? -- omnivorism (48.02%)

Epistemic justification: internalism or externalism? -- Don't know

Experience machine (would you enter?): yes or no? -- No

External world: idealism, skepticism, or non-skeptical realism? -- Non-skeptical realism

Footbridge (pushing man off bridge will save five on track below, what ought one do?): push or don't push? -- Don't push

Free will: compatibilism, libertarianism, or no free will? -- Liberatarianism

Gender: biological, psychological, social, or unreal? -- Biological

God: theism or atheism? -- Theism

Knowledge: empiricism or rationalism? -- Rationalism

Knowledge claims: contextualism, relativism, or invariantism? -- Don't know

Laws of nature: Humean or non-Humean? -- Don't know

Logic: classical or non-classical? -- Classical

Meaning of life: subjective, objective, or nonexistent? -- Objective

Mental content: internalism or externalism? -- don't know

Meta-ethics: moral realism or moral anti-realism? -- Moral Realism

Metaphilosophy: naturalism or non-naturalism? -- Non-naturalism

Mind: physicalism or non-physicalism? -- non-physicalism

Moral judgment: cognitivism or non-cognitivism? - Cognitivism

Moral motivation: internalism or externalism? -- Internalism

Newcomb's problem: one box or two boxes? -- Don't know

Normative ethics: deontology, consequentialism, or virtue ethics? -- Virtue ethics

Perceptual experience: disjunctivism, qualia theory, representationalism, or sense-datum theory? -- Don't know

Personal identity: biological view, psychological view, or further-fact view? -- Don't know

Philosophical methods (which methods are the most useful/important?) -- Don't know

Philosophical progress (is there any?): none, a little, or a lot? -- A lot (

Political philosophy: communitarianism, egalitarianism, or libertarianism? -- Libertarianism

Proper names: Fregean or Millian? -- Don't know

Race: biological, social, or unreal? -- Social

Science: scientific realism or scientific anti-realism? -- Scientific realism

Teletransporter (new matter): survival or death? -- Death

Trolley problem (five straight ahead, one on side track, turn requires switching, what ought one do?): switch or don't switch? -- Switch

Truth: correspondence, deflationary, or epistemic? -- Don't know

Vagueness: epistemic, metaphysical, or semantic? -- Don't know

Zombies: inconceivable, conceivable but not metaphysically possible, or metaphysically possible?

__________________________________________________________










Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Way of Kings and Words of Radiance -- Short review

Finished Sanderson's TWoK and WoR recently. Some notes:  Pacing: Definitely had some slower parts (especially TWoK's first 2/3rds). WoR's duels were better than the end.  Characters: Shallan's character really grew on me. I didn't expect to like her as much as I did. Kaladin continues to be very tiring -- albeit he is growing slowly. Contrary to what other readers think, I don't think he is actually dealing with depression. I think he's just exhausted. I did enjoy his realization that Elhokar was to Dalinar what Tien was to Kaladin. The analogy's good, but I think it's a bit forced given the asymmetry between Elhokar's poor moral record and Tien's blamelessness.   Dalinar has taken a backseat. I think that he continues to be too trusting of others (particularly Aladar and Sadeas). He takes risks that he shouldn't take, and gets away with it. For example, he insists on putting his whole camp in a position that cannot escape the Parshendi. ...
Read more

Belonging and Authenticity

 From a recent DEI training:  " Belonging: Feeling secure, supported, accepted and included - Ingredient that allows for authenticity - "True belonging is the spiritual practice of believing in and belonging to yourself so deeply that you can share your most authentic self with the world."  - "True belonging doesn't require you to change who you are; it requires you to be who you are" - Brene Brown  " I am going crazy. I have a feeling most social scientists have read little to no ethics at all. The same can be said about those in the political sciences -- specifically, policy-makers and the like. Most papers in the social sciences are chock full of normative statements that are taken as brute facts. Most policy is consequentialist with little to no restraint or consideration for anything other than bare utilitarianism.  But this isn't the point of this post. I wanted to critique their conception of what authenticity is and should be.  Their initia...
Read more

The Resilience of a Man

 Okay, forgive me for being parasocial. I'm watching jasontheween's prom night stream and the vibes are absolutely off. Before, Jason and his date Sakura got matching nail designs -- with Sakura having a "J" drawn on her nails. But later on in the night, Sakura half jokingly tells him that the "J" isn't for him but for his cameraman Jawhn. Jason asks her to take it back. She doesn't. The vibes immediately fall off. The car ride back is awkward as hell. It's obvious Jason wants to say something and Sakura's talking just to talk.  When they get back, Jason's friends are all telling him to keep shooting his shot and don't take the joke too seriously. But Jason's never had something like this happen to him so publicly. Yea, he's been "lil bro'd" before, but not to the extent of being in such a cuck position. It's absolutely infuriating to be put in that position. His friends are correct to say that he should take...
Read more