Nozick and Corporate Personhood

Corporate personhood is a legal/ethical concept in which organizations have the ability to own property, be held morally responsible, be allowed to go through due process, and enjoy civil rights that may previously have been exclusive to a nation's citizens. 

I don't think this is coherent because corporations are certainly not moral persons. 

But, interestingly enough, one can draw an analogy to Nozick's restrictions of a state's powers. Nozick believes the state to be made up of private actors, and because no organization can have more powers than its constituents, the state cannot have residual powers (the ability to tax or tariff, give welfare, or to conscript, or eminent domain). This in and of itself is controversial, but if corporations are also limited in power by their constituents (because they are made up of a contractual agreement by individuals), then corporations do not have residual powers. I wonder if corporations (or organizations in general) may be overstepping by being held accountable for something their constituents do. Or rather, what I mean to say is that we are mistakenly attributing conceptions of moral responsibility towards subjects typically thought to be individuals, which I believe to be a category error. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Way of Kings and Words of Radiance -- Short review

Belonging and Authenticity

The Resilience of a Man